|
Email: smeyer@tdl.com
If you are interested in Tachyon Design Automation's CVC Verilog HDL compiler,
visit www.tachyon-da.com.
CVC is now open source dual licensed software. You can download it by
clicking on the web page's download button and use it for free for
electronic design.
*** NEW YTD_IB_ANAL v1.20 of 03/06/26 NOW DOWNLOADING ***
C source program to analyze Interactive Brokers YTD statements.
Here is a program called ib_ytd_anal to analyze trades made at
Interactive Brokers.
The program prints a report giving trade and instrument P&L,
total returns, pending dividends etc. with monthly break downs.
ib_ytd_anal is free to use. A license is needed to sell it.
It is released in C source. Read the HOWTOUSE.TXT file.
You download the Interactive
Brokers Year-To-Date .csv file. That is the only input.
Idea of this program is to provide an alternative to spread sheet
and/or AI generated code that is simpler and more flexible.
It is part of my effort to falsify AI. I claim AI especially LLMs
do not work (incorrect scientific theory). My substack blog is
Steven Jay Meyer's
falsify AI blog
This simple C program organization is
an answer to proponents of AI who claim critics of AI do not know
anything about computer programming. Click on this link to download
the tar.bz2 file.
Paper falsifying AI in Scientific Research.
Extended abstract of paper falsifying AI "AI Limitations
in Growth of Scientific Knowledge". There is skepticism of AI
among philosophers of science. The topic will be discussed
at the end of August European Philosophy of Science Association
meeting in Groningen Netherlands but not from presented papers.
Extended abstract "Need for Pluralism in Philosophy
of Quantum Mechanics" Paper submitted to &HPS10 Conference.
Conference abstract size limit and inability to include
a list of references probably caused the paper to be misunderstood.
Here is the full extended abstract with references.
Talk on John von Neumann's philosophy of computation
Slides from my HOPOS 2024 talk "John von Neumann First Post
Hilbert Philosopher of Computation". Also a list of refernces
including background references. The submitted abstract is available
in the HOPOS 2024 book of abstracts. I hope some logician will
translate the 1968 Paul Finsler proof of the continuum hypothesis
into English.
Extended abstract submitted to the 2024 International Assoiation
for Computing and Philosophy conference (IACAP).
It updates my paper
falsifying AI from 2019 and updates a prelimary version submitted to the 2023
conference. This year's extneded abstracts allowed fewer words maybe to
allow feeding them to LLMs. Not mentioned is that for algorithm people,
LLMs and structural picture algorithms from computational geometry are almost
the same. I hope you will read the original paper uploaded to the
arXiv site (arXiv:1704.08111v3 [cs.AI]) and original Lighthill report.
Extended abstract submitted to the 2024 Feyerabend in Vienna
Conference. Most interesting part of this abstract is the references.
Another extended abstract of John von Neumann's philosophy of computation<
Extended abstract that is being presented at the 2024 HOPOS Conference
in Vienna. This version was not accepted by the 2023 EPSA conference.
A HOPOS oriented variant with title "John von Neumann First Post Hilbert
Philosopher of Computation" will be presented.
Slides from my 2023 International Congress on Logic, Methodology
and Philosophy of Science and Technology Conference (CLMPST)
Presentation on
computational hardness and weakness of Turing machines. Criticism
of the Cobham-Edmonds thesis.
Slides from 2022 Imre Lakatos Centenary Conference on Polya Influence on Laktos philosophy of Mathematics
-
George Polya's Contribution to Lakatos Philosophy of Mathematics
-
George Polya's Contribution Extended Abstract
Presentation from the Nov 2-4 2022 Imre Lakatos Centenary
Conference. Paper was motivated by correspondence in the John
Watkins Archive. Letters from Watkins to George Polya asking about his
contribution to Lakatos "Proofs and Reutations" book and quasi-empirical
philosophy of mathematics research programme. Slides also contain images and
text of correspondence between Polya and Lakatos from 1958 to 1964 and
a letter from Paul Feyerabend on philosophy of physics that Lakatos and
John Musgrave helped with. Argument is that Lakatos quasi-emprirical
research programme (Polya called it heuristics) is the best modern philosophy
of mathematics. Added the submitted extended abstract. Also, added a
reference to William Shockley's "Try Simplest Cases" paper on hidden
momentum. "Try Simplest Cases" was an important topic at the conference.
Shockley Paper started a recent controversy with some physicists still
claiming hidden momentum violates conservation of momentum.
Slides from NEPLS 2022 Argument for Complex Languages and Compilers talk
-
Argument for Complex Languages and Compilers
Talk to the New England Programming Language Society (NEPLS) 2022 meeting.
Idea is that when application programming speed is important, the
fastest computation needs to have a special purpose language defined
and a problem specific flow graph compiler developed that utilizes
modern CPU multi-issue and pipelining capability.
Slides from IACAP 2019 falsification of AI presentation
Slides plus list of references from my Eurocrypt 2019 rump session talk
Slides from my Eurocrypt 2017 Rump session talk
-
Quantum computers are a delusion - Feynman's joke
My best argument yet showing that quantum computers can not exist.
I added a item on Feyerabend and Bell's inequality because cryptographers
were not aware of Bell inequality as proof of entanglement.
Slides from CLMPS 2015 Philosophy of Physics Presentation
-
Popper School Methodological Disproof of Quantum Logic
Slides from my Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science
Conference presentation session C2.7. Abstract is available on the conference
web site, but as is described in these slides, talk changed. I need more time
to prepare the list of references I agreed to also post here.
Eurocrypt 2015 Rump Session Talk on William Tutte's Enigma Colussus Method
-
Tutte's Colossus Method Beginning of Modern Computation
Slides from my Eurocrypt 2015 Rump session talk. I tried
to show that William Tutte and the later Bletchley Park Enigma project
that used Tutte's algorithms programmed on Colossus deserve more credit
instead of Alan Turing and his logic substitution method. I ran out of time and
was worried that the Rump chair's may have innovated some new
unpleasant talk termination method so I was not able to explain
the problem with P=NP. I think Hartmanis' PRAM (parallel random
access memory) model where P == NP is a
better theoretical model for modern Von Neumann style computation.
I realized during the talk that my comparison of Tutte and Turing is
the same as Peter Naur's criticism of Turing 1937 work. Namely, CS
should be applied not formal mathematics.
IACAP (Computing and Philosophy) 2014 Conference Abstract and Slides
-
Two Computer Sciences: a Branch of Physics and Naur's Dataology
-
Slides from Conference Presentation
Paper presented at the 2014 International Association of Computing and
Philosophy Association conference. The abstract has the references
discussed in the talk added.
Paper argues that computer science should be studied as Naur's dataology
and the physics of computation instead of as engineering study of
the computer as a tool. Talk concentrates on computation and calculation
(historical too) part of CS.
IACAP (Computing and Philosophy) 2013 Conference Paper and Slides
-
Adding Methodological Testing to Naur's Anti-formalism
-
Slides from Conference Presentation with New Einstein and Feynman Quotes
Paper presented at the 2013 International Association of Computing and
Philosophy Conference. Paper discusses Peter Naur's very interesting
philosophy of computing (he calls it dataology). Naur is an important
founder of computing winner of the 2005 Turing Prize. An earlier
version of this paper is available on ArXiv archive (arXiv:1208:3739v1
[cs.OH]). New version here has some additional material on the newly
discovered Bohm response to Feyerabend's review of his book. The new material
ties Naur to the physics natural philosophy tradition. My talk adds more
quotations from Einstein and Feynman.
DPG Spring 2013 Working Group on Philosophy of Physics Presentation Slides
-
Methodological Testing of Fast Quantum Computers as Illusions Slides
Slides from my presentation at the Deutsche Phsyikalischen
Gesellshaft (DPG) spring meeting in Jena, Germany.
I argued that quantum computers are an illusion to a meeting of the DPG
Philosophy of Physics Working Group (AGPhil) symposium. I spoke in English and
to mostly physicists who were not familiar with Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn
philosophy of science and not familiar with the concepts from computational
complexity theory. These slides give some background and references for
things that I covered too quickly in my talk.
Feyerabend 2012 Conference Abstract and Presentation Slides
-
Feyerabend contribution to modern computational microphysics
-
Slides from my Presentation
During my presentation of Feyerabend's contribution to micro physics in
the late 1960s talk at the Feyerabend 2012 conference in Berlin, I did
not have time to show all my prepared slides and also included references not
used in my conference abstract. I have included links to both the slides as
a 28 page pdf file and the abstract here. The slides still have some typos
that are not fixed because I wanted to get the slides up as quickly
as possible. The abstract is also available
in the contributed paper section of the Program and Schedule. Here
is the link to the
Feyerabend2012
conference.
Paper submitted to 2011 European Philosophy of Science Association Conference on Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn defense of Vienna Circle Unifed Science
-
Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn as Cooperating Defenders of Vienna Circle Unified
Science
Paper argues these mid 20th century philosophers of science consciously
worked together to support the Vienna Circle theory of unified science and
to oppose the politicization of philosophy which they were already seeing.
The recent 2008 Adam Curtis BBC documentary "The Trap" expresses a modern
form of the LFK research programme - see especially episode 3's discussion
of the idea that Adam's Smith's "invisible hand of the market" is an
illusion - it does not exist.
ECAP-2010 Extended Abstract and Slides from Presentation
-
Empirical and Scientific Theories of Computation
-
Slides from the Talk
Extended Abstract and slides from paper presented at the
2010 European Conference on Computing and Philosophy.
Conference took place October 4-7 2010 at the Technische Universitaet
Munchen in Garching. Paper was just presented so the abstract and
slides are still unedited. Paper discusses various Antinomies (Finsler's
term for paradoxes and anomalies) in theoretical computer science.
It defends Paul Finsler's alternative and more general but not accepted
in the 1920s theory of mathematical foundations. Various antinomies
from current theoretical computer science are discussed. Paper
offers a sceptical view toward AI and explains how current formalist
methods have become dominant in CS without any debate.
Recent Unpublished Book Review Defending Feyerabend
Two Extended Abstracts from 2008 defending Vienna Circle Knowledge
Slides from Eurocrypt-2009 Rump Session Talk
-
Maybe Non Number Theory Cryptography is Worth Trying
The pdf file contains the slides from my 2009 Eurocrypt rump session talk.
I have been thinking that maybe there is something wrong with our current
conception of infinity. The mid 20th Century Swiss mathematician Paul
Finslser definitely thought so. The missing Finsler reference not given
in the slides is Finsler, P. (Translated with introductory comments by
Booth, D. and Ziegler, R.) "Finsler Set Theory: Platonism and Circularity."
The following statement by Finsler started my thinking: "Every inconsistency
in pure mathematics or in logic imperils the entire body of scientific
knowledge and must therefore be cleared up and done away with." (p. 56).
Since I only had four minutes to talk, I did not include Booth's discussion
of Finslers combinatorics of his Non-Well-founded sets (pp. 213-256) as
a possible self referential type of code.
ECAP-2008 Paper
-
Against Three Formalist Program Verification Methods - Extended Abstract
-
Text of Talk and Slides
I presented a talk at the ECAP-2008 (European Computing and Philosophy)
conference in Montpellier France in June. The first reference is the
text of the talk plus slides that argued using Vienna Circle philosophy.
The Second extended abstract makes the same argument using the more
confrontation Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn methodology of scientific research
programmes philosophy. See the extended abstract for detailed references.
The pdf files are also available with some discussion on the
ECAP-2008 wiki that requires a login.
Original Lighthill Report that Showed Impossibility of AI
-
Lighthill Report published by the British Government in 1972
-
Cognitive psychology response by N. S. Sutherland
published as Part II.
-
Computer science response by Dr. R. M. Needham published as Part III.
I found my copy of the Lighthill report booklet published by the
British Government in 1972. Sir James Lighthill, Lucian Professor of
applied mathematics at Cambridge, was commissioned by
the British Science Research Council to assist the British Government
in formulating research policy.
My copy was handed out as part of the reading list for a UC Berkeley
class. I do not know the author of the margin notations.
Format is scanned-in pdf scanned using high contrast gray scale.
was published with two responses. The pages are being scanned in now.
Until they are ready, a typed in version of the Lighthill Report can found at:
Methodology Papers
-
Scientific Disproof of Computer Program Verification
Rejected extended abstract submitted to the 2006 ECAP Conference (computers
and philosophy). It appears that the wrong program verification by
mathematical proof theory is still beyond criticism (see structured
programming paper below).
I feel it is important to follow the Vienna Circle belief that using
analytical philosphy to correct scientific errors is important even if
it is politically unpopular.
-
Proposal to Teach Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn Philosophy of Science
Essay defending Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn written as a proposal to teach
a philosophy of science seminar in their style. Since the material
is surprising, letters from the Lakatos archive at LSE were originally
attached, but there is a problem with copyright permission so the letters
are not attached. They are available online for situations involving Copyright
fair use. The essay argues that much late 20th century scientific progress
was engendered by the LFK programme.
-
Pragmatic Versus Structured Computer Programming
My intended UC Berkeley CS Department ph.d. thesis reformatted as a section
for a once contemplated book.
-
Should Computer Programs Be Verified
I still have not been able to get any of my criticism of
object oriented (structured) computer programming papers
published. This short paper appeared in the unrefereed
SigPlan Newsletter. My contribution seems to have been
to change the once distinguished computer science publication
Communications of the ACM into a popular science
magazine and to eliminate the foreign language requirement
from computer science graduate programs in the US.
Slides From Recent Lectures
-
Toward Anti-formalist Computer Science
Lecture given at ECAP-2005 Conference that criticizes various aspects
of current computer science methodology. Talk includes detailed
criticism of current AI and quantum computing theories. A list of
references has been added to the end. I am working on turning the
material into a philosophy paper now.
-
The Vienna Circle's Successors in Minnesota and America
History lecture presented at the University of Minnesota
Center for Austrian Studies. Also, explains the
Lakatos-Feyerabend-Kuhn Methodology of scientific research
programmes philosophical theory.
SBIR Research Grant Proposal with Reviewers Negative Evaluations
Spice Circuit Simulator Differential Equation Solver Improvement
Rejected Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant proposal
along with reviewer's comments.
I have posted the in the hope it will help people prepare grant proposals.
It contains examples of grant language and budgets.
The lesson learned is: do not try to get an SBIR business grant by
proposing a mathematical improvement (better differential equation solving).
I still think huge improvements using symbolic searching of the flow graph
equations coded from the Spice equations is possible.
Two Probably Unpatentable Verilog HDL area software patent applications
-
Simulator Independent Object Code HDL Simulation Using PLI
A software patent applications that discloses a method that discloses
how to use the Verilog Programming Language Interface (PLI) application programming
interface (API) to produce a particular company or Verilog simulator independent
model compiler (way of distributing circuit models for simulation in electronic
systems). Patent was rejected and we have abandoned the application because
the invention is probably unpatentable "abstract ideas,
law of nature or natural phenomenon" that can "be implemented by
the mind of a person or by the use of a pencil and paper". Since
the patent application was filed in 1999, six of the 17 years have already
elapsed. Finally, in the currently business climate, a model compiler that
does not tie customers to a particular brand is not economically feasible.
US publication number (application dates back to 2000 before patents were
published) is US 2002/0138244A1.
-
Mixed Signal Simulation
A software patent applications that discloses a way to use the Verilog Programming
Language Interface (PLI) application programming interface (API) for mixed Spice
differential equations analog and digital boolean algebra electric circuit simulation.
This is the form submitted to the World Intellectual Property Organization - a
clearing house.
Patent was also rejected by the US PTO and we have given up for the same
reasons the model compiler patent was abandoned (see above).
Published patent application reference is: WO0203310A1.
-
US Patent office response to the "Mixed Signal Simulation" patent
Interesting response from the US patent office to the 2nd patent.
The inventions are probably not patentable under current European
patent rules that the examiner is seemingly applying to our US application.
I need not mention that we are research grant and patent application losers,
but the writing helped improve our software. My current thinking is
that the "software machine" the legal system uses does not correctly
view computer machines (see the various Penrose books - Shadow
of the Mind, etc.).
Old computer science papers - mostly in the compiler area
Slides from informal Rump Sessions Talks at Cryptography Conferences
|